|
|
|
1
|
Would you use suitable Open-Source Software in your company for
production work?
(An example of popular Open Source Software is
the operating system "Linux")
|
| |
Don't know
Yes, I generally prefer Open Source Software over commercial
Yes, but only if I can rely on a distribution offering support
No, I prefer commercial software
|
|
|
|
2
|
Do you currently use a standard
parts application or library? |
| |
Yes
No
|
|
|
|
3
|
If so, which one do you use? Please tick the one(s) you use most
frequently.
|
| |
Own library, created by myself or my company
SolidWorks (former Cimlogic) Toolbox
Cadenas Part Solutions
SolidPartner's SolidParts
PowerWorks Norm
DPS Varbox
CAD Parts
Genius / Web2CAD PowerParts
Trace Parts
Ideal Parts
SolidMech / PartsWorks.com
Capvidia
DynaBits geniusworx
EcoNorm
Other:
|
|
|
|
4
|
Please indicate your overall satisfaction with each product by
entering a number between 1 and 5. Rate only applications you
use or have used in the past 12 months (leave the other boxes
empty).
Scale: 1=excellent, 2=good, 3=average, 4 = fair, 5=poor
|
| |
Own library, created by myself or my company
SolidWorks (former Cimlogic) Toolbox
Cadenas Part Solutions
SolidPartner's SolidParts
PowerWorks Norm
DPS Varbox
CAD Parts
Genius / Web2CAD PowerParts
Trace Parts
Ideal Parts
SolidMech / PartsWorks.com
Capvidia
DynaBits geniusworx
EcoNorm
Other:
|
|
|
|
5
|
Would you use an (additional)
standard parts application, provided it meets all your needs? |
| |
Yes
Maybe
Most likely not
|
|
|
|
6
|
We plan to release our standard
parts application EcoNorm as Open Source Software. How interested
would you be in using this application? |
| |
Very interested
Somewhat interested
Not really interested
|
|
|
|
7
|
Would you be interested in
participating in the development?
There will be no compensation other then the influence, fun and
honor working on such a project in an open team. |
| |
Very interested
Somewhat interested
Not really interested
|
|
|
|
8
|
Please rate your Visual Basic
skills, tick all that apply. |
| |
I'm not familiar with Visual Basic at all
I can modify SolidWorks macros
I have written some smaller Visual Basic applications
I have released software to the public
I'm familiar with SolidWorks API
I'm familiar with Database programming and SQL
I'm familiar with the Windows API
I'm also familiar with C++ or Delphi
|
|
|
|
9
|
Only if you are interested
in becoming a member in the development group:
How many hours a week would you realistically dedicate to the development
for a standards part application. |
| |
0 hours
1...3 hours a week
3...8 hours a week
8...16 hours a week
over 16 hours a week
|
|
|
|
10
|
Would you or your company
subscribe to an official "distribution" on CD-ROM, which
ensures you will receive about twice a year the latest stable and
official releases with online help, a professional setup routine
and with the latest additions to the parts library - for a moderate
price? |
| |
Yes, I would subscribe, this is a must for our production environment
I would most likely subscribe, depends on the price
Probably not, I don't mind downloading and compiling the applications
No, we'll not subscribe if it costs anything
|
|
|
|
11
|
What do you think would be
a fair yearly subscription price for a bi-yearly CD-ROM distribution
including shipping costs? |
| |
US$ 0
US$ 10
US$ 30
US$ 50
US$ 70
US$ 90
US$ 110
US$ 130
|
|
|
|
12
|
How important do you rate
the following features for a standard parts application. Please
enter a number from 1 to 4 in the left box for each feature:
Scale: 1=very important, 2=important, 3=nice to have, 4=no need |
| |
|
Extensive parts library
|
|
|
Easily extensible with own parts
|
|
|
Functionality for hole generation with
automatic components placement and mating (for screws, washers,
nuts)
|
|
|
Automated mate creation between the
components on preselected faces or edges on the destination part
|
|
|
Selectable materials, surface treatments
etc. for standard parts
|
|
|
Different geometric detail levels for
frequently used parts (simplified, detailed, non-interfering...)
|
|
|
|
13
|
Which Standards should a Standard
Parts library contain: |
| |
ISO
DIN
ANSI
JIS
Other:
|
|
|
|
14
|
Which other Hardware parts
(type or manufacturer) should it contain |
| |
Electric connectors
Electric standard motors
Pneumatic actuators, valves etc.
Hydraulic actuators, valves etc.
Mold bases
Chain wheels, tooth belt gears and utilities
Other:
|
|
|
|
15
|
How would you like the idea
of creating an exchange network through this Open-Source project
where users can offer their own standard parts and download parts
from other users - similar to Napster, Gnutella and other exchange
networks, but with one or several central server(s) for high reliability? |
| |
Excellent idea, I would participate and share my own standard
parts
Interesting, but I have security, reliability or other concerns
Not interested, we would not allow our parts to be uploaded or
shared
|
|
|
|
16
|
Leave any other comments if
you like: |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Click this Button when you're
done:
|
| |
Your opinion counts, thank you very much for
your time!
|